Tag Archives: Debt

Red Ink Rising, December 14, 2009

Below is a summary of The Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform report titled “Red Ink Rising:  A Call to Action to Stem the Mounting Federal Debt” released in December 2009.  The debt is now close to 100% of GDP and the debt continues to worsen.  I have posted this two year old material to illustrate that the situation is very serious and politicians in Washington are not serious about solving the debt problem. 

According to the Executive Summary, the public debt of the United States rose from 41% to 53% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2009.  Considering the current spending and revenue projections, the Peterson-Pew Commission expects this debt to continue to grow faster than the economy, eventually leaving a debt greater than the GDP.  The Commission calls on Congress and the Whitehouse to make serious changes to fiscal and monetary policy that will include specific policies to stabilize debt and set annual debt targets.  Without major changes in US fiscal policy, the debt will continue to grow to unprecedented levels and this will lead to a debt crisis that will have serious effects for all Americans.  In order to stabilize the debt, the Commission recommends six steps.  First, commit to stabilize the debt at 60% of GDP by 2018.  Second, develop a specific and credible debt stabilization package in 2010.  Third, begin to phase in policy changes in 2012.  Fourth, review annual progress and implement an enforcement plan.  Fifth, stabilize the debt by 2018 and lastly, continue to reduce the debt as a share of the economy over the long run.

A major contributor to the debt problem was the government’s response to the economic downturn and the decreased revenue from a shrinking GDP.  The economy will recover, but the effects on the budget may continue to be felt for the next 30 years or longer.  The government’s current high borrowing habits are not sustainable and will create a number of problems.  The interest alone from such high borrowing will continue to grow and become a larger portion of our over all debt which will lead to the crowding out of other important spending.  “An ever growing debt would likely hurt the American standard of living by fueling inflation, forcing up interest rates, dampening wages, slowing economic growth and job creation…” (p7) The greatest contributor to the ever widening gap between spending and revenue is the ever increasing government spending.  Much of this spending is due to the demographic shift toward an older population, which will call for increases in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.  According to the Commission, these areas of spending will be where government can have the best chance for savings and provide opportunities to stabilize the debt.

Something must be done now because the risks of inaction are too great.  Without action, living standards could fall, interest payments will continue to grow, future investment in America will decline, the dollar could lose value, and future generations will pay for today’s spending.  The future viability of the United States and future generations of Americans depend on debt stabilization and it is the federal government’s responsibility to begin solving this problem now.

Leave a comment

Posted by on December 30, 2011 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , ,

The Corporate Cash Myth

Normally, I do not just repost other’s articles, but this speaks for itself.

In this article titled “The Corporate Cash Myth“, Neerah Chaudhary makes a good point about the “mainstream” narrative that corporations are sitting on huge piles of cash and that government needs to be used to go in and take the money away in order to put it to use in our stagnant economy. 

In short, despite huge amounts of cash on their balance sheets, America’s largest companies are as broke as the rest of the country, and not only are they in no position to hire workers, but higher interest rates could result in more layoffs at a time when the nation can least afford it. Given these factors, economists, journalists and politicians should be applauding corporate cash reserves not deriding them.

Leave a comment

Posted by on December 19, 2011 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , ,

The New York Times has Jokes

The New York Times, in their editorial “The Republican Wreckage”, makes an almost humorous claim:  “House Republicans have lost sight of this country’s welfare.”  Don’t be confused, there’s not a whole lot of difference between an establishment Republican and an establishment Democrat, however in this entire, sad situation, the House Republicans actually voted on and passed “Cut, Cap, Balance”.  Apparently, Mr. Boehner dismissed the President’s “plea” for compromise.

And why is compromise such a good thing?  According to President Obama, Republicans are violating the country’s founding principle of compromise.  Again, if this wasn’t serious I’d be laughing my butt off.  Here’s the irony:  In order to stick to the principle of compromise (which isn’t really a founding principle in my opinion), we must compromise every other principle this country was founded upon.  Read the rest of this entry »

1 Comment

Posted by on November 29, 2011 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , ,


At the age of 16, I worked at a cabinet factory over the summer delivering counter tops, cleaning up around the shop, installing hardware, and performing whatever odd job that happened to arise.  After two weeks of working 40 hours each week, I received my pay and pay stub.  I saw that a fairly large portion had been taken in taxes.  I accepted this because I did not know any better.  It was the income tax and everybody paid it. 

What I did not know at that time was this:  For two weeks I had been advancing my labor and incurring a credit for work performed.  So what does this mean?  This means that the cabinet factory had incurred a debt and I a credit.  The debt was the wage promised by the cabinet factory and the credit was the money owed at the end of the agreed upon pay period.  How was such an arrangement agreed to?  The cabinet factory proposed a wage and a pay period and I, having the choice to accept, deny, or renegotiate, chose to agree to their terms. 

So I pose this question to you:  Does the government have the authority to step between two private parties who have a private agreement and confiscate a portion of a debt owed?  Was the money handed to me by the cabinet factory really “income” and had I earned a profit?  Or had I just broke even?  Both the cabinet factory and I agreed to the terms, so both of us must have benefited from the transaction.  But, can this be considered profit or even income?  Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a comment

Posted by on November 29, 2011 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , ,